From waltman at pobox.com Sun Oct 3 10:51:47 2010 From: waltman at pobox.com (Walt Mankowski) Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 10:51:47 -0400 Subject: [PADS] Should PADS mailing list be shut down? In-Reply-To: <20100916132600.GU6503@LinuxForce.net> References: <20100916131748.GT6503@LinuxForce.net> <20100916132600.GU6503@LinuxForce.net> Message-ID: <20101003145147.GA21597@mawode.com> I think the lack of response to this email is an excellent argument in favor of shutting it down. :) Walt On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:26:00AM -0400, CJ Fearnley wrote: > Tom, > > 52 people are on the list. > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:23:54AM -0400, Tom Limoncelli wrote: > > How many people are on the list? > > -- > We are on a spaceship; a beautiful one. It took billions of years to develop. > We're not going to get another. Now, how do we make this spaceship work? > -- Buckminster Fuller > > CJ Fearnley | Explorer in Universe > cjf at CJFearnley.com | "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller > http://www.CJFearnley.com | http://blog.remoteresponder.net/ > > _______________________________________________ > PADS mailing list > PADS at lists.linuxforce.net > http://lists.linuxforce.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pads -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 190 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: